Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S286263AbSBZNMW>; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 08:12:22 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S286521AbSBZNMM>; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 08:12:12 -0500
Received: from smtp-out-2.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.19.254]:52612 "EHLO
	mel-rto2.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S286263AbSBZNMC>; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 08:12:02 -0500
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 14:11:44 +0100
From: wwp <subscript@free.fr>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: low latency & preemtible kernels
Message-Id: <20020226141144.248506fa.subscript@free.fr>
Organization: -
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.2claws6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; )
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi there,

here's a newbie question:
is it UNadvisable to apply both preempt-kernel-rml and low-latency patches
over a 2.4.18 kernel?

thanx in advance

-- 
wwp
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/