Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764568AbZDCKkH (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2009 06:40:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763994AbZDCKiS (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2009 06:38:18 -0400 Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.26]:27669 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762943AbZDCKiQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2009 06:38:16 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-disposition:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=cv2v8lWG/fhkevgXZoIu9kf5twSo6hBjWILPp/B3gyJonp/AdfgqW3eFmZUR116R9c jLDmWouxz6LKj0IpmNuVPc82+qYhdBJVpU6yBgBTfpAXQBOjSWhTNzQ/i6YV/eEqNMLI PX5iOkgaR+VY6NQM2KNewtbKcGWwSJ+z2DIb8= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: petkovbb@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ide-cd: cleanup cdrom_decode_status Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:41:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.1 (Linux/2.6.29-next-20090403; KDE/4.2.1; i686; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org References: <1238655519-10074-2-git-send-email-petkovbb@gmail.com> <200904030108.39927.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20090403045803.GA3732@liondog.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20090403045803.GA3732@liondog.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904031241.44597.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1201 Lines: 26 On Friday 03 April 2009, Borislav Petkov wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 01:08:39AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Thursday 02 April 2009, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > - have (almost) equal handling of commands based solely on sense_key > > > > I'm having a VERY hard time trying to review this patch because at > > the same time that codepaths were merged if()s were replaced by switch() > > which in turn resulted in change of intendation... on top of that > > the patch description is very vague about this part of the changes... > > I completely and exactly understand what you are saying :), I thought so > too when I looked at the diffs yesterday. Well, if it's any consolation, the > patches've been tested so they seem to work :). Anyway, split version coming > up... The split version looks exactly the same except ide_cd_breathe() change when it comes to the main part. Did you send the wrong version by any chance? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/