Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S129256AbQJ0Sx1>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:53:27 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S129392AbQJ0SxR>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:53:17 -0400
Received: from shell.webmaster.com ([209.133.28.73]:40185 "EHLO
	shell.webmaster.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S129256AbQJ0SxI>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:53:08 -0400
From: "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com>
To: "Jason Wohlgemuth" <jswkernel@triad.rr.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: GPL Question
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:53:06 -0700
Message-ID: <NCBBLIEPOCNJOAEKBEAKMEJFLIAA.davids@webmaster.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
In-Reply-To: <39F9AF0E.70406@triad.rr.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


> Now, if a module is loaded that registers a set of functions that have
> increased functionality compared to the original functions, if that
> modules is not based off GPL'd code, must the source code of that module
> be released under the GPL?

	If the answer to this is "yes", then Microsoft should own some rights to
every piece of software that uses the Windows API.

	DS

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/