Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 13:02:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 13:02:36 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:60686 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 13:02:20 -0500 Message-ID: <3C7BCD4A.9020400@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 10:00:42 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rose, Billy" CC: "'Martin Dalecki'" , Mike Fedyk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ext3 and undeletion In-Reply-To: <4188788C3E1BD411AA60009027E92DFD063077D8@loisexc2.loislaw.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rose, Billy wrote: > > My company can tolerate 0% loss of data (which is why I raised this issue). > There is no such thing as 0% loss of data. You can get some amount of security with backups, snapshots (really useful!) or undelete, but you can *NEVER* guarantee 0% loss of data... consider the case when a (l)user overwrites (not just deletes) a newly created file. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/