Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758056AbZDEUF1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Apr 2009 16:05:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757301AbZDEUFM (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Apr 2009 16:05:12 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:33123 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755769AbZDEUFL (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Apr 2009 16:05:11 -0400 Message-ID: <49D90EED.2060703@zytor.com> Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:05:01 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?QWxlamFuZHJvIFJpdmVpcmEgRmVybsOhbmRleg==?= CC: Martin Steigerwald , Bryan Henderson , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Replacing VFAT as filesystem on removeable media References: <200904031029.03581.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <49D8510A.3010606@zytor.com> <20090405153041.08238acf@varda> In-Reply-To: <20090405153041.08238acf@varda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 778 Lines: 23 Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote: >>> >> Ironically enough, one of the better filesystems for being supported by >> many OSes is probably ext2. However, that doesn't mean it is even in >> the same rough ballpark as (V)FAT. > > What about UDF ? Good point. UDF is probably widely supported, but again, not in the same ballpark. I don't personally know how complex UDF is to implement on a small memory device. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/