Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 16:36:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 16:36:03 -0500 Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:9485 "EHLO zero.tech9.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 16:36:01 -0500 Subject: Re: crypto (was Re: Congrats Marcelo,) From: Robert Love To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Andreas Dilger , "Dennis, Jim" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" In-Reply-To: <3C7BFAFA.D8923CFF@mandrakesoft.com> In-Reply-To: <2D0AFEFEE711D611923E009027D39F2B153AD4@cdserv.meridian-data.com> <20020226140644.U12832@lynx.adilger.int> <3C7BFAFA.D8923CFF@mandrakesoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 26 Feb 2002 16:35:54 -0500 Message-Id: <1014759355.1109.31.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 16:15, Jeff Garzik wrote: > I would -love- to see crypto in the mainstream kernel. Distribution of > crypto software on kernel.org has been OK for a while now. > > Who knows what the kerneli guys, freeswan, etc. guys think. > > IMO it's time to get a good IPsec implementation in the kernel... Besides IPsec, what crypto is there for the kernel? I've never really understood what "crypto in the kernel means" since it all should be a userspace thing. Except IPsec, of course, and adding Freeswan would be a Good Thing. Freeswan people? One thing I've heard in the past is "Yes, the US is safe now wrt encryption but is not" -- and I've seen country=France,etc i.e. (self) important places. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/