Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 17:34:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 17:34:20 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:24069 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 17:34:04 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 19:33:50 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Andreas Dilger , "Dennis, Jim" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: Re: crypto (was Re: Congrats Marcelo,) In-Reply-To: <3C7BFAFA.D8923CFF@mandrakesoft.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote: > IMO it's time to get a good IPsec implementation in the kernel... Where would we get one of those ? The freeswan folks seem quite determined to not let any americans touch their code, so inclusion of their stuff into the kernel is out. Do you know of a nice ipsec implementation we could use? Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/