Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760995AbZDGUbP (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:31:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755378AbZDGUbB (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:31:01 -0400 Received: from waste.org ([66.93.16.53]:39835 "EHLO waste.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755230AbZDGUbA (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:31:00 -0400 Subject: Re: IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM question... From: Matt Mackall To: Robin Getz Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Peterson In-Reply-To: <200904070716.25846.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> References: <200904061430.26276.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> <1239044483.14392.55.camel@calx> <200904070716.25846.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:57:31 -0700 Message-Id: <1239116251.14392.133.camel@calx> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1791 Lines: 42 On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 07:16 -0400, Robin Getz wrote: > On Mon 6 Apr 2009 15:01, Matt Mackall pondered: > > On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 14:30 -0400, Robin Getz wrote: > > > We have lots of embedded headless systems (no keyboard/mouse, no > > > soundcard, no video) systems with *no* sources of entropy - and > > > people using SSL. > > > > I'd rather add a random_sample_network call somewhere reasonably central > > in the network stack. Then we can use the knowledge that the sample is > > network-connected in the random core to decide how to measure its > > entropy. The trouble with IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM is that many of its users > > are technically bogus as entropy sources in the current model. > > OK - that makes more sense. > > Does that mean we also shouldn't be using IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM on interrupt > sources in subsystems which already have add_xxx_randomness() in them? (block > devices, and input devices?) > > block/blk-core.c -> blk_end_io() -> add_disk_randomness() > drivers/input/input.c -> input_event() -> add_input_randomness() > > drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c, line 639 > > drivers/input/touchscreen/wm97xx-core.c, line 374 > drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c, line 145 > drivers/input/keyboard/bf54x-keys.c, line 255 > drivers/input/serio/hp_sdc.c, line 881 Yes. The flag needs to be taken out and shot. Everything going into the RNG should be made to go through an add_*_randomness interface only. Preferably not at a per-driver level. -- http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/