Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 18:30:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 18:30:40 -0500 Received: from paloma13.e0k.nbg-hannover.de ([62.181.130.13]:26858 "HELO paloma13.e0k.nbg-hannover.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 18:30:27 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" From: Dieter =?iso-8859-15?q?N=FCtzel?= Organization: DN To: "J.A. Magallon" Subject: Re: low latency & preemtible kernels Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 00:30:12 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.9] Cc: wwp , Linux Kernel List In-Reply-To: <200202261918.53190.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> <20020226235510.E6197@werewolf.able.es> In-Reply-To: <20020226235510.E6197@werewolf.able.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200202270030.12347.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Dienstag, 26. Februar 2002 23:55:23, J.A. Magallon wrote: > On 20020226 Dieter N?tzel wrote: > >wwp wrote: > >> Hi there, > >> > >> here's a newbie question: > >> is it UNadvisable to apply both preempt-kernel-rml and low-latency > >> patches over a 2.4.18 kernel? > > > >In short: no ;-) > > > >Try 2.4.18-rc4-jam2 for example. It should apply against 2.4.18 final, > > too. > > Correction: jam2 is O(1)-multi-queue scheduler + low-latency, no > preeemt there. I put it on top as always...;-) Did that before all by hand, now you have set the starting point. Regards, Dieter BTW I will use 2.4.18-jam1. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/