Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 06:03:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 06:03:11 -0500 Received: from a203-167-249-89.reverse.clear.net.nz ([203.167.249.89]:9740 "HELO metastasis.f00f.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 06:02:58 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 23:32:27 +1300 From: Chris Wedgwood To: romieu@ensta.fr Cc: Ivan Passos , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Configuring synchronous interfaces in Linux Message-ID: <20001201233227.A9457@metastasis.f00f.org> In-Reply-To: <20001201100124.A4986@se1.cogenit.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001201100124.A4986@se1.cogenit.fr>; from romieu@cogenit.fr on Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 10:01:24AM +0100 X-No-Archive: Yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 10:01:24AM +0100, Francois romieu wrote: > Questions: > - Is there any existing _standard_ interface to do that?? No. [...] > I'm interested in implementing this, but I don't want to reinvent the > wheel (if such wheel exists ...). Ditto. Actually; Ethernet badly needs something like this too. I would kill to be able to do something like: ifconfig eth0 speed 100 duplex full o across different networks cards -- I've been thinking about it of late as I had to battle with this earlier this week; depending on what network card you use, you need different magic incarnations to do the above. A standard interface is really needed; unless anyone objects I may look at drafting something up -- but it will require some input if it is not to look completely Ethernet centric. --cw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/