Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761370AbZDHHUL (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:20:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753634AbZDHHT4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:19:56 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:34580 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753395AbZDHHTz (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:19:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 16:18:24 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Andrew Morton , "lizf@cn.fujitsu.com" , Rik van Riel , Bharata B Rao , Dhaval Giani , KOSAKI Motohiro , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFI] Shared accounting for memory resource controller Message-Id: <20090408161824.26f47077.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20090408071115.GD7082@balbir.in.ibm.com> References: <20090407063722.GQ7082@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20090407160014.8c545c3c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090407071825.GR7082@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20090407163331.8e577170.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090407080355.GS7082@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20090407172419.a5f318b9.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090408052904.GY7082@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20090408151529.fd6626c2.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090408070401.GC7082@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20090408160733.4813cb8d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090408071115.GD7082@balbir.in.ibm.com> Organization: FUJITSU Co. LTD. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1241 Lines: 36 On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:41:15 +0530 Balbir Singh wrote: > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [2009-04-08 16:07:33]: > 1. First our rss in memory.stat is confusing, we should call it anon > RSS ok. but ....changing current interface ? > 2. We need to add file rss, this is sort of inline with the > information we export per process file_rss and anon_rss maybe good. *but* active/incative ratio in lru file cache is good estimation for this. > 3. Using the above, we can then try to (using an algorithm you > proposed), try to do some work for figuring out the shared percentage. > This is the point. At last. Why "# of shared pages" is important ? I wonder it's better to add new stat file as memory.cacheinfo which helps following kind of commands. #cacheinfo /cgroups/memory/group01/ /usr/lib/libc.so.1 30pages /var/log/messages 1 pages /tmp/xxxxxx 20 pages ..... ..... Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/