Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933732AbZDHOPv (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:15:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933470AbZDHOL6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:11:58 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:35403 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933463AbZDHOLy (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:11:54 -0400 Cc: FUJITA Tomonori , beckyb@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeremy@goop.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com Message-Id: From: Kumar Gala To: Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <20090408140521.GB12931@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] swiotlb: (re)Create swiotlb_unmap_single Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:10:38 -0500 References: <77EA4458-602F-4DA9-B7E7-E48B5B0DCF91@kernel.crashing.org> <20090408022241U.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <726BF449-4F7A-472D-AC5A-D8218B61210B@kernel.crashing.org> <20090408031541G.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20090408124322.GG18581@elte.hu> <20090408140521.GB12931@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1285 Lines: 35 >>> >>> the patches came right in the merge window - that's too late for >>> IOMMU bits, the patch cutoff is generally the beginning of the merge >>> window. (Which was on March 23 in this window) >> >> Fair. >> >>> But i can queue them up in the .31 queue if it has all the Acks from >>> you folks. Becky, mind resending the latest version, with all the >>> acks in place? >> >> I can do this in Becky's abscense this week. The only "acks" I've >> seen are from FUJITA Tomonori. > > _your_ ack (or signoff) counts too - so to me it's plural :-) I've added my signoff :) >> Can we ask there be a unique swiotlb branch in your tree to make >> it easier for us to continue additional swiotlb work as well as >> arch specific work. > > yes - tip:core/iommu is already distinct from tip:x86/iommu and is > intended for such more generic patches. It has no patches pending > right now (it just got all merged upstream) - so please use an > upstream base - 2.6.30-rc1 would be a good starting point. Just reposted v3 based on 2.6.30-rc1 - k -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/