MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <grlpna$3sq$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20090409181039.GA605@elte.hu> <grlpna$3sq$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:19:56 +0200
Message-ID: <897274600904091819q2ab5338fpe2125d7dc1c671e3@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC GIT PULL (late)] Xen updates for v2.6.30
From: "Morten P.D. Stevens" <mstevens@win-professional.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1156
Lines: 29

2009/4/9 Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@gmail.com>:

> There are a lot of us that would really like to see Xen dom0 merged
> upstream, and several people were disappointed when it didn't go in the
> 2.6.30-rc1 merge window (check that thread). ?The biggest concern was "do
> people _want_ Xen merged?" rather than any technical problems with the code.
> I think, without a doubt, yes. ?Xen is used by many corporations. ?It has
> excellent performance, works across platforms that do not have hardware
> virt, and has a proven track record -- check out companies like Linode.com
> and Slicehost. ?It also has the maintainership of Citrix, so it is unlikely
> that the code will stagnate or become a burden to other maintainers.

100% agree.

It is very important for thousands of companies to get xen dom0
support, right now.

We need Linux 2.6.30 with xen dom0 support.

Please, merge it.

Best Regards,

Morten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/