Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933137AbZDJJt7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:49:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753335AbZDJJtn (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:49:43 -0400 Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:44324 "EHLO fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932463AbZDJJtj (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:49:39 -0400 Message-ID: <49DF1626.8080009@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:49:26 +0900 From: Hidetoshi Seto User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: ying.huang@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] [3/4] x86: MCE: Improve mce_get_rip References: <20090407506.675031434@firstfloor.org> <20090407150656.43E161D046D@basil.firstfloor.org> <49DC5D11.4060505@jp.fujitsu.com> <87eiw3a29h.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <49DD80B4.5060301@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090409071413.GD14687@one.firstfloor.org> <49DDC70E.2000602@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090409101349.GH14687@one.firstfloor.org> <49DECD2F.6060708@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090410082545.GP14687@one.firstfloor.org> In-Reply-To: <20090410082545.GP14687@one.firstfloor.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1023 Lines: 29 Andi Kleen wrote: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 01:38:07PM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote: >> I still believe that using MSR which only available on 32bit from 64bit > > The MSR is available on 64bit too (there are 64bit capable P4s > like Prescott or Smithfield) The problem is the name which the MSR locating address 189H has. Do you mind if I put this topic on the back-burner? >> BTW, since this patch is "Improve", I think you need to clarify why you >> bind it into the "bugfix" patch set for 2.6.30. If there are known bug, >> please describe about it. > > It reports the incorrect RIP, fixing one of the test cases in the > MCE regression test suite. Why is it incorrect? In what case, what result is expected because why, and how this patch fix it? Thanks, H.Seto -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/