Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755622AbZDKHoT (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:44:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754088AbZDKHoE (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:44:04 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.224]:27126 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751963AbZDKHoC convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:44:02 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Hy8hoLNiE0nLZlEl8Wx4mqReN1TqQ0vAUw4DQfI2iYlEbMSjKcYZjmNpmfkd2QW2L7 QA2LSPbtn1AbUOD6y/drxx8ImWvm9T+/TVo+vZ/R7aY3nuyZm/OAkB46Gb02KZWcLX4u vpRGaTy0cUA++npAScCGHLOED2GKC5/QQg5xU= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20090408210735.GD11159@us.ibm.com> <20090410200919.GA7242@us.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:44:01 -0700 Message-ID: <86802c440904110044t7a932c41w95c32de1acaf7c5@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] [BUGFIX] x86/x86_64: fix CPU offlining triggered inactive device IRQ interrruption From: Yinghai Lu To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Gary Hade , mingo@elte.hu, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lcm@us.ibm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3427 Lines: 75 On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Gary Hade writes: > >> On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 06:29:10PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>> Gary Hade writes: >>> >>> > Impact: Eliminates a race that can leave the system in an >>> > ? ? ? ? unusable state >>> > >>> > During rapid offlining of multiple CPUs there is a chance >>> > that an IRQ affinity move destination CPU will be offlined >>> > before the IRQ affinity move initiated during the offlining >>> > of a previous CPU completes. ?This can happen when the device >>> > is not very active and thus fails to generate the IRQ that is >>> > needed to complete the IRQ affinity move before the move >>> > destination CPU is offlined. ?When this happens there is an >>> > -EBUSY return from __assign_irq_vector() during the offlining >>> > of the IRQ move destination CPU which prevents initiation of >>> > a new IRQ affinity move operation to an online CPU. ?This >>> > leaves the IRQ affinity set to an offlined CPU. >>> > >>> > I have been able to reproduce the problem on some of our >>> > systems using the following script. ?When the system is idle >>> > the problem often reproduces during the first CPU offlining >>> > sequence. >>> >>> You appear to be focusing on the IBM x460 and x3835. >> >> True. ?I have also observed IRQ interruptions on an IBM x3950 M2 >> which I believe, but am not certain, were due to the other >> "I/O redirection table register write with Remote IRR bit set" >> caused problem. >> >> I intend to do more testing on the x3950 M2 and other >> IBM System x servers but I unfortunately do not currently >> have access to any Intel based non-IBM MP servers. ?I was >> hoping that my testing request might at least get some >> others interested in running the simple test script on their >> systems and reporting their results. ?Have you perhaps tried >> the test on any of the Intel based MP systems that you have >> access to? >> >>> Can you describe >>> what kind of interrupt setup you are running. >> >> Being somewhat of a ioapic neophyte I am not exactly sure >> what you are asking for here. ?This is ioapic information >> logged during boot if that helps at all. >> x3850: >> ? ? ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x0f] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0]) >> ? ? IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 15, version 0, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-35 >> ? ? ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x0e] address[0xfec01000] gsi_base[36]) >> ? ? IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 14, version 0, address 0xfec01000, GSI 36-71 >> x460: >> ? ? ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x0f] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0]) >> ? ? IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 15, version 17, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-35 >> ? ? ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x0e] address[0xfec01000] gsi_base[36]) >> ? ? IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 14, version 17, address 0xfec01000, GSI 36-71 >> ? ? ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x0d] address[0xfec02000] gsi_base[72]) >> ? ? IOAPIC[2]: apic_id 13, version 17, address 0xfec02000, GSI 72-107 >> ? ? ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x0c] address[0xfec03000] gsi_base[108]) >> ? ? IOAPIC[3]: apic_id 12, version 17, address 0xfec03000, GSI 108-143 > > Sorry. ?My real question is which mode you are running the ioapics in. > looks like ack_level_irq. YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/