Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753085AbZDMBNx (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:13:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752467AbZDMBNl (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:13:41 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:39818 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750734AbZDMBNk (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:13:40 -0400 Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:13:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20090412.181330.23529546.davem@davemloft.net> To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: paulus@samba.org, mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, shemminger@vyatta.com, jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com, dada1@cosmosbay.com, jengelh@medozas.de, kaber@trash.net, r000n@r000n.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20090412173108.GO6822@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20090411174801.GG6822@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <18913.53699.544083.320542@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20090412173108.GO6822@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1152 Lines: 29 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 10:31:08 -0700 > On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 09:34:27PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: >> Paul E. McKenney writes: >> >> > If the generic implementation is needed only on !SMP systems, that >> > could work. The architectures I would be worried about include >> > powerpc and ia64, which I believe support 32-bit SMP builds. >> >> 32-bit powerpc doesn't have 64-bit atomic operations and does support >> SMP. >> >> What about ARM? I thought they had 32-bit SMP these days as well. > > Some of Steve Hemminger's recent suggestions in this thread seem to me > to avoid this whole issue nicely. But we will see! ;-) I hope so. Eventually it seems that all of the older 32-bit SMP platforms will be run under a bus having to execute some many "efficient" primitives using the "hash table of spinlocks" scheme for synchronization. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/