Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 15:14:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 15:13:43 -0500 Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.97]:8196 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 15:13:19 -0500 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200202272012.XAA10411@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: Fw: memory corruption in tcp bind hash buckets on SMP? To: raghuangadi@yahoo.com (Raghu Angadi) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 23:12:53 +0300 (MSK) Cc: davem@redhat.com, raghuangadi@yahoo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020227200521.60597.qmail@web12302.mail.yahoo.com> from "Raghu Angadi" at Feb 27, 2 12:05:21 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! > inverted order of insertion into the lists in tw_hashdance() is probably > cleaner fix than inverted order of removal.. Why are they not equivalent? Good question? :-) Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/