Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752605AbZDMUMN (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:12:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751268AbZDMUL5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:11:57 -0400 Received: from 69-30-77-85.dq1sn.easystreet.com ([69.30.77.85]:50279 "EHLO kingsolver.anholt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750977AbZDMUL4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:11:56 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] x86, PAT, CPA: Cleanups and minor bug fixes From: Eric Anholt To: Ingo Molnar Cc: venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suresh Siddha In-Reply-To: <20090411070035.GB11799@elte.hu> References: <20090409212646.511925000@intel.com> <1239396112.6356.10.camel@gaiman.anholt.net> <20090411070035.GB11799@elte.hu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-FtED2Ze3nN5mkhQKO69M" Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:11:52 -0700 Message-Id: <1239653512.29473.74.camel@gaiman.anholt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2068 Lines: 57 --=-FtED2Ze3nN5mkhQKO69M Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 09:00 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Eric Anholt wrote: >=20 > > On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 14:26 -0700, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com wrote: > > > This patchset contains cleanups and minor bug fixes in x86 PAT and CP= A > > > related code. The bugs were mostly found by code inspection. There > > > should not be any functionality changes with this patchset. > >=20 > > I've been curious, what are you using to test PAT changes for=20 > > regressions? I've got some regression tests at: > >=20 > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools/ > >=20 > > Requires KMS enabled and master of libdrm, but after that you can=20 > > sudo make check, and it tests execution of several DRM paths=20 > > without requiring X. In benchmarks/ there are a few=20 > > microbenchmarks of various mapping types, which has been useful in=20 > > making sure that we're ending up with the right PTEs. >=20 > Looks really nice! Regarding libdrm, is there a version cutoff from=20 > where it is expected to work just fine? I've got this version:=20 > libdrm-2.4.6-3.fc11.x86_64. I should keep the pkgconfig check up to date, but in the worst case it doesn't compile and you go get new libdrm. The 2.4.6 check right now appears to be correct. --=20 Eric Anholt eric@anholt.net eric.anholt@intel.com --=-FtED2Ze3nN5mkhQKO69M Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAknjnIgACgkQHUdvYGzw6vf1nwCeLT4L0Yez23/26h2tT24GKYj0 bCgAnAtUeYWoyyxjkqOiziU29Q2+jfDh =cJzO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-FtED2Ze3nN5mkhQKO69M-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/