To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hugh@veritas.com,
       jmorris@namei.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.30-rc1] RCU detected CPU 1 stall
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
References: <200904110608.IED21123.FQOVMtSOOHFFLJ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
	<20090410231245.GF6719@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20090410233919.GS26366@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
	<200904130048.n3D0mw1f077050@www262.sakura.ne.jp>
	<20090413195504.GF6983@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090413195504.GF6983@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <200904140631.BCI82883.LFOHOFJtFMOSVQ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:31:05 +0900
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1001
Lines: 29

Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hello.
> > 
> > Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > Is this reproducible?
> > Not always, but it is reproducible.
> 
> Does it reproduce well enough to bisect?
> 
Not impossible, but difficult. This happens less than once on 10 trials.

> > Al Viro wrote:
> > > I'd really love to see results of repeated alt-sysrq-p/alt-sysrq-l, just
> > > to see where was it actually spinning.
> > Below is sysrq message.
> > Maybe something related to khelper's current->mm == NULL warning problem.
> > Full log is at http://I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp/tmp/dmesg-2.6.30-rc1-200904130930.txt .
> 
> I have to defer to the mm guys on this one.

Latest info on khelper's current->mm == NULL warning problem is at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/13/85 .

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/