Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753211AbZDNLH2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:07:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751540AbZDNLHS (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:07:18 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:42606 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751314AbZDNLHR (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:07:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:06:10 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Rusty Russell Cc: Dave Jones , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith , Venkatesh Pallipadi , Len Brown , Zhao Yakui , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] use smp_call_function_single() in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c Message-ID: <20090414110610.GO3558@elte.hu> References: <20090413000630.21C09DE12A@ozlabs.org> <20090413001657.GA24946@redhat.com> <200904141835.41961.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200904141835.41961.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 986 Lines: 26 * Rusty Russell wrote: > On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:46:57 am Dave Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 09:30:02AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > From: Andrew Morton > > > > > > Impact: fix sysbench(oltp)+mysql 10% regression with 2.6.30-rc1 > > > > > > > This, and the other cpufreq related patches in this series look > > sound to me. Given the other non-cpufreq bits in the series, do > > you want to just have these go through Andrew and onto Linus? > > Sure, that's certainly easiest for me. I'd assumed Ingo would > snarf them, but as he's suggested -mm, Andrew? I tend to let the snarfing be done by the tree which introduced a regression to begin with ;-) Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/