Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756022AbZDNMdB (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:33:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754688AbZDNMcf (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:32:35 -0400 Received: from mail001.aei.ca ([206.123.6.130]:37209 "EHLO mail001.aei.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754054AbZDNMce (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:32:34 -0400 From: Ed Tomlinson To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: 2.6.30-rc1 - nmi_watchdog broken? Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:29:21 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.30-rc1-crc; KDE/4.2.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200904140000.30155.edt@aei.ca> <20090414084232.GG27003@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20090414084232.GG27003@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904140829.21493.edt@aei.ca> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1548 Lines: 44 On Tuesday 14 April 2009 04:42:32 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I've been having fun finding bugs in 30-rc1. One of them is a > > hard freeze. I've not seen this type of problem on this hardware > > before 30-rc1 - so I doubt if its hardware. The best way I know > > to debug a hard hang is with the nmi_watchdog. I just cannot get > > it to work. > > [ Btw., have you tried CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y - does it produce > anything before or at the hard lockup point? ] > > > The system is a 3 core amd cpu on a 790gx chipset. > > > > If I boot the nmi_watchdog=1 it complains that lapci is not > > available and the boot stops. Same problem if I change the > > clocksource to tsc, If I disable highres timers it panics. If I > > use nmi_watchdog=2 it panics. Am I doing something wrong or have I > > hit a bug? > > > > Logs of boots with and without highres timers inlined below. > > hm, nmi_watchdog=1 acting funny is not unheard of. But > nmi_watchdog=2 should really work. How does it panic, do > you have a capture of that? I had not tried nmi_watchdog=2 highres=off. This works. Looks like there is a conflict between highres timers and nmi_watchdog here. Any ideas? TIA Ed PS. I'll build with config_prove_locking tonight. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/