Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:06:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:05:51 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:19024 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:05:42 -0500 Subject: Re: watchdog software To: oles@ovh.net (octave klaba) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 14:34:58 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org) In-Reply-To: <3A27B04B.1A628ADE@ovh.net> from "octave klaba" at Dec 01, 2000 03:06:03 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > my question is: > > > what kind of problem can have this serveur: > > > hardware or software ? > > > > What sort of watchdog are you using ? > > software. no hardware solution. > http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/system/daemons/watchdog/watchdog-5.1.tar.gz The software watchdog will fail if the kernel is badly mashed or interrupts are disabled. That means it doesn't help tell me if the problem was hardware or software (nor in general do hardware watchdogs). Is this one box running different loads to the others or different in any notable way ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/