Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 18:33:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 18:31:27 -0500 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101]:43913 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 18:31:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 15:32:23 -0800 From: Hanna Linder To: Alexander Viro , Andrew Morton cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , Hanna Linder , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] lockmeter results comparing 2.4.17, 2.5.3, and 2.5.5 Message-ID: <31490000.1014852743@w-hlinder.des> In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.0 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --On Wednesday, February 27, 2002 16:48:07 -0500 Alexander Viro wrote: > > ed mm/vmscan.c < /shrink_icache_memory/s/priority/1/ > w > q > EOF > > and repeat the tests. Unreferenced inodes == useless inodes. Aging is > already taken care of in dcache and anything that had fallen through > is fair game. > FYI: The patch does this: *** vmscan.c.orig Wed Feb 27 14:09:49 2002 --- vmscan.c Wed Feb 27 14:10:16 2002 *************** *** 578,584 **** return 0; shrink_dcache_memory(priority, gfp_mask); ! shrink_icache_memory(priority, gfp_mask); #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA shrink_dqcache_memory(DEF_PRIORITY, gfp_mask); #endif --- 578,584 ---- return 0; shrink_dcache_memory(priority, gfp_mask); ! shrink_icache_memory(1, gfp_mask); #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA shrink_dqcache_memory(DEF_PRIORITY, gfp_mask); #endif - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/