Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:36:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:36:00 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:32137 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:35:08 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 16:32:46 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20020227.163246.80134237.davem@redhat.com> To: afranck@gmx.de Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, florin@iucha.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.19pre1-ac1 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <02022801273203.01097@dg1kfa> In-Reply-To: <02022801273203.01097@dg1kfa> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Andreas Franck Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 01:27:32 +0100 + return i ? : -EFAULT; ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ <- This looks somewhat bogus, shouldn't it be "return i ? i : -EFAULT;" instead? They are equivalent, "x ? : foo" is a shorthand for "x ? x : foo" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/