Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 20:48:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 20:47:35 -0500 Received: from chicken.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.114]:19963 "EHLO chicken.mail.pas.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 20:47:17 -0500 From: "Karl" To: "Erik Mouw" Cc: Subject: RE: Kernel module ethics. Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 20:03:31 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20020228005152.GB8858@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>A couple of months ago Larry McVoy gave this excellent advice: >> If you really want to know where you stand, it'll cost you around >> $15K and that, in my opinion, is fine. If it isn't worth $15K to >> protect your code then it is worth so little to you that there really >> is no good reason not to just GPL it from the start. >>Erik Hello Erik, I hope this is not to ignorant a question: From your post I do not understand what costs around $15k (yes generally I understand protecting source) but specifically, is this for patent, copyright or some strange relicensing fee. Not that I am interested in that line of action, but just the ambiguity piqued my interest. I would appreciate any level of elaboration. Thanks much, Karl Tatgenhorst - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/