Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753380AbZDONpg (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:45:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751052AbZDONp1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:45:27 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:41911 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751791AbZDONp0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:45:26 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ring_buffer: enlarge RB_MAX_SMALL_DATA From: Steven Rostedt To: Lai Jiangshan Cc: Ingo Molnar , Frederic Weisbecker , LKML In-Reply-To: <49E5A593.6090605@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <49E2AAB3.9010801@cn.fujitsu.com> <1239633781.21121.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <49E5A593.6090605@cn.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Red Hat Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:45:01 -0400 Message-Id: <1239803101.21121.69.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1825 Lines: 58 On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 17:14 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > > How about this method: > > {u32 type_len:5, time_delta:27;}; > > time_delta is still 27bits, but RB_MAX_SMALL_DATA is increased to 112, > it is larger than 60 in my patch. > > type_len actual type actual len > 0 RINGBUF_TYPE_DATA, array[0] > 1 ~ 28 RINGBUF_TYPE_DATA 4*1 ~ 4*28 > 29 RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_STAMP > 30 RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_EXTEND > 31 RINGBUF_TYPE_PADDING array[0] if it's not the last event > in the buffer_page(discarded event) > If you like this method, I will implement it. I like the idea a lot. The only issue I have with it is that these types are used a lot in switch statements, and in fast paths. But the compression may be a better win. We could do this in the switches. switch (event->type_len) { case RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_STAMP: /**/ break; case RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_EXTEND: /**/ break; case RINGBUF_TYPE_PADDING: /**/ break; default: /* RINGBUF_TYPE_DATA */ } But before any of this goes in. I would like to export the interface. Yes it is suppose to be OK to be able to change the interface, but the binary output made it into 30. I doubt this change will make it before 31. If that's the case. We must have the format listed. 30 is expected to be used by many distros. There's already tools using ftrace. If we make a change that can not be caught, then it will break many tools. We could ask Linus to pull this into 30 because it is a API change. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/