To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mmotm 2009-04-14-17-24 uploaded
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:27:19 PDT."
             <49E5FCD7.8060902@linux.intel.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
References: <200904150024.n3F0Ovdo019569@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <22518.1239773374@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
            <49E5FCD7.8060902@linux.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1239815458_5930P";
	 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:10:58 -0400
Message-ID: <24159.1239815458@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1018
Lines: 31

--==_Exmh_1239815458_5930P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:27:19 PDT, Arjan van de Ven said:

> it depends on a patch that now has gone mainline....

OK, I just reverted it locally, and will assume we just hit a race condition
with the timing of pull requests and when Andrew created the origin.patch
and linux-next.patch.  If it's still wrecked in the next mmotm tarball that
Andrew posts, I'll follow up then.


--==_Exmh_1239815458_5930P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQFJ5hUicC3lWbTT17ARAmPsAKC93Swl/Ynko800Jdv2wuvwOGC9nwCglICc
5NHOjvn+Oo317bBTdj8WtEA=
=qA5G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1239815458_5930P--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/