Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756037AbZDPBal (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:30:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751575AbZDPBa3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:30:29 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:55643 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751294AbZDPBa3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:30:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:32:13 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Mark Lord Cc: Greg KH , Jeff Garzik , Linux USB kernel mailing list , Alan Stern , LKML , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: USB storage no-boot regression (bisected) Message-ID: <20090415183213.7962d929@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <49E657BC.6000707@rtr.ca> References: <49E4FAC6.1030400@garzik.org> <20090415014930.GA29413@kroah.com> <49E5480F.10501@garzik.org> <20090415050947.GB3462@kroah.com> <49E5EE41.3090505@rtr.ca> <20090415073001.503b0361@infradead.org> <49E5FF48.3030809@rtr.ca> <20090415125813.34c9a151@infradead.org> <49E657BC.6000707@rtr.ca> Organization: Intel X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by casper.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1549 Lines: 49 On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:55:08 -0400 Mark Lord wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:37:44 -0400 > > Mark Lord wrote: > > > >> Arjan van de Ven wrote: > >>> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:25:05 -0400 > >>> Mark Lord wrote: > .. > >>>> Not forever, just a few seconds to compensate for the regression. > >>> seconds!!!!! > >>> The whole kernel boots in half a second! > >> .. > >> > >> Oh, absolutely I agree. > >> > >> That's why I'm not suggesting a DELAY > >> but rather a TIMEOUT (where it keeps trying up until the timeout). > > > > This exists today. It's just not something Jeff chose to use ;) > > (because he didn't need to) > > > >> For desktop, it should really just wait forever, > >> but I can understand situations (server room) > >> where that would be a Really Bad Idea. > > > > it's called rootwait and such :) > .. > > No, that's not the same thing. > rootwait has no timeout -- it waits *forever*, > which will break auto-recovery on servers. btw while I don't disagree that something like this is nice... .... who would boot their server from a USB stick for production use? -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/