Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755659AbZDPLXs (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:23:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754350AbZDPLXi (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:23:38 -0400 Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.236]:37412 "EHLO pfepb.post.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754827AbZDPLXh (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:23:37 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:25:43 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: devzero@web.de Cc: Randy Dunlap , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Should MODULE_DESCRIPTION be mandatory ? Message-ID: <20090416112543.GA2672@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <672387486@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <672387486@web.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 685 Lines: 16 > > > > i can offer spending an afternoon (or more) on compiling a list of modulenames + missing description for review. > if that list is complete and ack`ed, i could create a patch or patch series from that. > (maybe the list could be split into logical parts, too) If you do this then you should feed the patches via the maintainers. I suggest to start out with the network stuff and see if netdev/David Miller will take them. Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/