Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757990AbZDPQuT (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:50:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755259AbZDPQuG (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:50:06 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:55410 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753843AbZDPQuE (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:50:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:49:27 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Christoph Hellwig , Alexander Viro Cc: Alessio Igor Bogani , Frederic Weisbecker , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Jonathan Corbet , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] remove the BKL: Replace BKL in mount/umount syscalls with a mutex Message-ID: <20090416164927.GB19281@elte.hu> References: <1239892078-6039-1-git-send-email-abogani@texware.it> <20090416143626.GA17683@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090416143626.GA17683@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1242 Lines: 31 * Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 04:27:58PM +0200, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote: > > Replace ths BKL in sys_mount()/sys_umount() syscalls with a regular mutex. > > Could you try to explain what these actuall try to protect? They dont really protect anything - the patch is wrong and equivalent to a plain removal of the BKL. The only case we found to ever matter in practice is NFS: it really wants to get rid of the BKL in nfsd_get_sb(). So pushing down the BKL lock into per filesystems and then removing it from NFS should do the trick. Would be nice to have some tentative Ack (or, a tentative non-immediate-NAK) from Al before we go touch a lot of filesystems though. Stupid dont-waste-human-effort considerations and stuff. For us, the much simpler solution would be to drop the BKL in nfsd_get_sb() and go on with life without to touch a dozen or so filesystems. Alessio, mind trying that too, is it a solution for your testcase? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/