Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:27:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:24:47 -0500 Received: from harpo.it.uu.se ([130.238.12.34]:29398 "EHLO harpo.it.uu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:21:53 -0500 From: Mikael Pettersson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15486.26414.396199.94258@harpo.it.uu.se> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 18:21:50 +0100 To: Martin Wilck Cc: Linux Kernel mailing list Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Timer interrupt lockup on HT machine In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under Emacs 20.7.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Martin Wilck writes: > Another observation is that on the HT machines (whether or not the > above problem occurs) almost all interrupts seem to be handled by CPU 0. > > CPU 1 gets a few, but in a ratio of about 1:10000 wrt CPU 0. > CPU 2 and 3 do not see any interrupts at all. > > Has anybody heard of these problems yet, and are workarounds available? I've heard about that IRQ imbalance on MP P4 Xeons from a person at Dell. My understanding of it is that it's a consequence of the local APIC priorization changes Intel did in the P4 xAPIC design. (Study Intel's IA32 Vol 3 manual in detail and you'll see them.) Supposedly Ingo Molnar is working on a solution. /Mikael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/