Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:04:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:01:26 -0500 Received: from think.faceprint.com ([166.90.149.11]:56990 "EHLO think.faceprint.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:00:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:59:54 -0500 To: Dave Jones , Benjamin Pharr , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vojtech@suse.cz Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.5-dj1 - Bug Reports Message-ID: <20020228165951.GA4014@faceprint.com> In-Reply-To: <20020221233700.GA512@hst000004380um.kincannon.olemiss.edu> <20020222022149.N5583@suse.de> <20020222063721.GA8879@faceprint.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020222063721.GA8879@faceprint.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i From: faceprint@faceprint.com (Nathan Walp) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 01:37:24AM -0500, Nathan Walp wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 02:21:49AM +0100, Dave Jones wrote: > > > It compiled fine. When I booted up everything looked normal with the > > > exception of a=20 > > > eth1: going OOM=20 > > > message that kept scrolling down the screen. My eth1 is a natsemi ca= rd. > >=20 > > That's interesting. Probably moreso for Manfred. I'll double check > > I didn't goof merging the oom-handling patch tomorrow. >=20 > Ditto here on my natsemi. It hasn't really spit out the error since > boot, about 12 hours ago. Card has been mainly idle, only used to > connect via crossover cable to my laptop, which hasn't been used much in > that time. dj2 is showing the same behavior, but I found out that the messages continue to be printed 100 times/second until I ping-flooded the machine on the other end of that card. The minimal DHCP traffic prior to the ping flood was not enough to make it stop. Hope this helps narrow down the problem some. Nathan --=20 Nathan Walp || faceprint@faceprint.com GPG Fingerprint: || http://faceprint.com/ 5509 6EF3 928B 2363 9B2B DA17 3E46 2CDC 492D DB7E --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8fmIHPkYs3Ekt234RAlVeAJ4i9giRTadcFgqAjzqE6gOgpyUdOgCfaGpC QuwvQRhBbv+cf1e0wCq/9X4= =WmWT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/