Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760069AbZDQIxX (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:53:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757187AbZDQIxO (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:53:14 -0400 Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:50652 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755405AbZDQIxN (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:53:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:51:40 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Ryo Tsuruta , yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp, righi.andrea@gmail.com, menage@google.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, agk@sourceware.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, axboe@kernel.dk, baramsori72@gmail.com, chlunde@ping.uio.no, dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dpshah@google.com, eric.rannaud@gmail.com, fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, taka@valinux.co.jp, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, matt@bluehost.com, dradford@bluehost.com, ngupta@google.com, randy.dunlap@oracle.com, roberto@unbit.it, s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com, subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] bio-cgroup controller Message-Id: <20090417175140.9e285acf.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20090417174854.07aeec9f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1239740480-28125-4-git-send-email-righi.andrea@gmail.com> <49E7E037.9080004@oss.ntt.co.jp> <20090417112433.085ed604.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090417.162201.183038478.ryov@valinux.co.jp> <20090417170016.5c7268f1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090417174854.07aeec9f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Organization: FUJITSU Co. LTD. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1969 Lines: 53 On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:48:54 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:00:16 +0900 > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:22:01 +0900 (JST) > > Ryo Tsuruta wrote: > > > > > In the case where the bio-cgroup data is allocated dynamically, > > > - Sometimes quite a large amount of memory get marked dirty. > > > In this case it requires more kernel memory than that of the > > > current implementation. > > > - The operation is expansive due to memory allocations and exclusive > > > controls by such as spinlocks. > > > > > > In the case where the bio-cgroup data is allocated by delayed allocation, > > > - It makes the operation complicated and expensive, because > > > sometimes a bio has to be created in the context of other > > > processes, such as aio and swap-out operation. > > > > > > I'd prefer a simple and lightweight implementation. bio-cgroup only > > > needs 4bytes unlike memory controller. The reason why bio-cgroup chose > > > this approach is to minimize the overhead. > > > > > My point is, plz do your best to reduce memory usage here. You increase > > size of page_cgroup just because you cannot increase size of struct page. > > It's not be sane reason to increase size of this object. > > It's a cheat in my point of view. > > > > Can't this work sanely ? > Hmm, endian is obstacle ? > == > sturct page_cgroup { > union { > struct { > unsigned long memcg_field:16; > unsigned long blockio_field:16; > } field; > unsigned long flags; /* unsigned long is not 32bits */ > } flags; > } > == > ....sorry plz ignore. -Kame -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/