Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760369AbZDQJeY (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:34:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760206AbZDQJeD (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:34:03 -0400 Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([93.163.65.50]:59570 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760156AbZDQJeB (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:34:01 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:34:00 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Alan Jenkins Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [Bug #13058] First hibernation attempt fails Message-ID: <20090417093359.GQ4593@kernel.dk> References: <20090417063007.GB4593@kernel.dk> <49E83DC4.8040207@tuffmail.co.uk> <20090417091321.GP4593@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090417091321.GP4593@kernel.dk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1799 Lines: 46 On Fri, Apr 17 2009, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17 2009, Alan Jenkins wrote: > > Jens Axboe wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 16 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > >> of recent regressions. > > >> > > >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > >> from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > >> (either way). > > >> > > >> > > >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13058 > > >> Subject : First hibernation attempt fails > > >> Submitter : Alan Jenkins > > >> Date : 2009-04-10 10:58 (7 days old) > > >> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1faa16d22877f4839bd433547d770c676d1d964c > > >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123928022321917&w=2 > > >> > > > > > > Alan, is this still a problem? > > > > > > > Yup. Still present in v2.6.30-rc2-195-g9f76208. > > Given the somewhat odd nature of the bug and the requirements to trigger > it, how confident are you in the bisection results? > > I'll try and reproduce it here. I can't reproduce it here. It seems very odd that an ENOMEM would happen as a consequence of the rq allocation change, it doesn't really change the allocation at all (and it'll never return -ENOMEM). Can you please recheck the git bisect results. It'd be nice if the hibernation failure would actually log where the problem occured... -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/