Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762044AbZDQRO6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:14:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758813AbZDQROt (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:14:49 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:60583 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757025AbZDQROs (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:14:48 -0400 Message-ID: <49E8B907.9000109@goop.org> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:14:47 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Rostedt CC: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/pvops: target CREATE_TRACE_POINTS to particular subsystems References: <1239950139-1119-1-git-send-email-jeremy@goop.org> <1239950139-1119-3-git-send-email-jeremy@goop.org> <49E8AAC8.5080004@goop.org> <49E8B2EB.8030108@goop.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1832 Lines: 77 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > >> Steven Rostedt wrote: >> >>> Ah yes! It needs to be: >>> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TRACE_POINTS >>> #undef CONFIG_IRQ_TRACE_POINTS >>> #include >>> #endif >>> >>> Otherwise we get into the recursion again. >>> >>> >> We should probably also move the #define TRACE_SYS in there as well (without >> the #undef), as it should only have one definition at a time... >> > > Actually, I'm kind of against that. Just because as it stands, the > TRACE_SYSTEM macro is up at the top, and it is easy to see. > Yes, but it means that if you're in the middle of CREATE_FOO_TRACE_POINTS and foo.h happens to include bar.h, suddenly TRACE_SUBSYSTEM becomes bar... > Actually, we could do (from the top of the file) > > #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TRACE_POINTS > #undef CONFIG_IRQ_TRACE_POINTS > > #define TRACE_SYSTEM irq > > #include > > #elif !defined(_TRACE_IRQ_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ) > #define _TRACE_IRQ_H > > #include > #include > > > [...] > > #endif > That's slightly different from what we have now. At the moment its #if !defined(_TRACE_IRQ_H)... ... #endif #ifdef CREATE_IRQ_TRACE_POINTS ... #endif So we get both the main part of the file and the CREATE_X_TRACE_POINTS parts. Your suggestion makes them exclusive: #ifdef CREATE_IRQ_TRACE_POINTS ... #elif !defined(_TRACE_IRQ_H)... ... #endif Does that make a difference? J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/