Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755327AbZDSJDc (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:03:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753828AbZDSJDX (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:03:23 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:43972 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753810AbZDSJDW (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:03:22 -0400 Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:02:08 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Yinghai Lu , Jesse Barnes , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, yannick.roehlly@free.fr Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/pci: make pci_mem_start to be aligned only -v4 Message-ID: <20090419090208.GA30211@elte.hu> References: <20090416165640.GA13927@elte.hu> <49E76864.9060309@kernel.org> <20090416172803.GB16618@elte.hu> <49E7916C.7050701@kernel.org> <49E99054.6050208@kernel.org> <49EA57C4.1000603@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1038 Lines: 27 * Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > And that _is_ a really odd hole. I wonder what it is all about. > > But the approach does seem to have done the right thing. > > I'll commit the reserve_region_with_split() change. There are no > actual users of it now, so committing that change doesn't really > do anything, but I like removing code, and with the only current > potential user actively wanting just the simpler behavior, why > keep the code around? Cool! Yinghai, mind (re-)sending the latest version of the remaining two patches, so what we can pick this up into the x86 tree and get it tested? I'd say it's for v2.6.31. (unless someone can think of a strong reason to do this sooner.) Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/