Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753498AbZDTIrS (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:47:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752219AbZDTIrD (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:47:03 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:56855 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751785AbZDTIrB (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:47:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:46:31 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: KOSAKI Motohiro , Andrew Morton , Oleg Nesterov Cc: Zhaolei , Frederic Weisbecker , Steven Rostedt , Tom Zanussi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] ftrace, workqueuetrace: Make workqueuetracepoints use TRACE_EVENT macro Message-ID: <20090420084631.GA32625@elte.hu> References: <20090420103612.4B4E.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <47EF9F5C609F496FBBD423EA81A00920@zhaoleiwin> <20090420104734.4B51.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090420104734.4B51.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1220 Lines: 32 * KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > OK. > > thus, I recoomend to pending 2 and 3. and change 1 as Ingo > suggested. if not, reviewer might forgot this thread. Ok - but even the original order of patches would be fine - as long as the end result is agreed on and is reached. I've asked Frederic (the original author of the workqueue tracer plugin) to collect these patches into a topic branch in his tree. Once it's a complete story we can pull it into tip:tracing/core. Oleg seemed not to disagree and Andrew is in hiding. Andrew, Oleg: if you plan to make unhappy noises about this level of instrumentation in the workqueue code, please do it sooner rather than later, as there's quite some effort injected into this already. A tentative non-NAK now (patches are still being sorted out) and an Ack on the final topic tree from you (once we send it and if it's good) and general happiness would be the ideal outcome :) Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/