Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 20:41:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 20:37:31 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:15121 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 20:37:03 -0500 Subject: Re: Congrats Marcelo, To: davej@suse.de (Dave Jones) Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 01:51:51 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), marcelo@conectiva.com.br (Marcelo Tosatti), jdennis@snapserver.com (Dennis Jim), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ('linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org') In-Reply-To: <20020301020328.A7662@suse.de> from "Dave Jones" at Mar 01, 2002 02:03:28 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > sensor in the machine. Once you are using ACPI though you talk to ACPI > > and it talks to the smbus etc and knows whats in the box > > Given the fears of what happens when you look at i2c/smbus etc > the wrong way, is this something we can rely on DMI tables > to get right ? When they can't get cachesize info right, I begin > to question their ability to describe a temperature sensor. The ones I looked at seemed credible - but yes it is an issue 8) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/