Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 01:34:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 01:32:30 -0500 Received: from pcp809261pcs.nrockv01.md.comcast.net ([68.49.81.201]:14476 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 01:29:34 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 01:29:33 -0500 From: Olivier Galibert To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the tree Message-ID: <20020301012933.A6621@zalem.nrockv01.md.comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: Olivier Galibert , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To:

Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 12:13:08AM -0300 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 12:13:08AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > You can send marcelo such a patch (without the scheduler) right > now. And it's even probably a better idea to send it without the scheduler. It's a typical Al Viro[tm] patch, change a repeated group of code into one macro/function with zero impact on the resulting code, only better encapsulation. It is completely orthogonal to the scheduler, and obviously low risk. OG. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/