Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757397AbZDUUpc (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:45:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754351AbZDUUpV (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:45:21 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:43748 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754011AbZDUUpU (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:45:20 -0400 Message-ID: <49EE304D.5060108@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:45:01 +0300 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Liguori CC: Huang Ying , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] Add MCE support to KVM References: <1239953345.6842.3.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com> <49E9F7BE.4090904@codemonkey.ws> <49EAE334.9020803@redhat.com> <49EDF057.9060501@codemonkey.ws> <49EDF287.9020908@redhat.com> <49EE2497.3060009@codemonkey.ws> <49EE25CB.6070709@redhat.com> <49EE27C2.3060505@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <49EE27C2.3060505@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1726 Lines: 40 Anthony Liguori wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: >> No argument. But some kernel features will require major rework in >> qemu before we can support them properly. We'll still want to bring >> them to users quickly so users can enjoy them (and we can enjoy users >> testing them). Waiting for a qemu rework may take a while, and we'll >> lose valuable feedback. > > Then we're failing. If a particular implementation of a feature is > acceptable for kvm-userspace users, and we don't take it in QEMU > without requiring a huge amount of different work, then it suggests > something is broken about the QEMU process. > Example: SMP. Example: vlan API. >> For this kind of work, we can provide kvm-userspace.git as a kind of >> playground where these experiments may be made. kvm-userspace.git >> exists to support kvm.git; while qemu.git has a life of its own and >> more stringent barriers to acceptance. > > As long as people are using kvm-userspace.git instead of qemu.git, > we're failing IMHO. If kvm-userspace.git is basically the equivalent > of the x86 git kernel tree, linux-next, or something like that, then > that's a good thing. That's definitely a long term goal, but qemu is not yet at a point where it is easy to implement new features efficiently. Once it reaches that state, kvm-userspace will become a simple staging ground (or even disappear entirely). -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/