Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752538AbZDVAEE (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:04:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751352AbZDVADw (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:03:52 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:50065 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751281AbZDVADw (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:03:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:02:18 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki To: Andrew Morton Cc: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add file based RSS accounting for memory resource controller (v3) Message-Id: <20090422090218.6d451a08.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20090421132551.38e9960a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20090416120316.GG7082@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20090417091459.dac2cc39.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090417014042.GB18558@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20090417110350.3144183d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090417034539.GD18558@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20090417124951.a8472c86.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090417045623.GA3896@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20090417141726.a69ebdcc.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090417064726.GB3896@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20090417155608.eeed1f02.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090417141837.GD3896@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20090421132551.38e9960a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Organization: FUJITSU Co. LTD. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3558 Lines: 101 On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:25:51 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:48:38 +0530 > Balbir Singh wrote: > > > > > ... > > > > We currently don't track file RSS, the RSS we report is actually anon RSS. > > All the file mapped pages, come in through the page cache and get accounted > > there. This patch adds support for accounting file RSS pages. It should > > > > 1. Help improve the metrics reported by the memory resource controller > > 2. Will form the basis for a future shared memory accounting heuristic > > that has been proposed by Kamezawa. > > > > Unfortunately, we cannot rename the existing "rss" keyword used in memory.stat > > to "anon_rss". We however, add "mapped_file" data and hope to educate the end > > user through documentation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh > > > > ... > > > > @@ -1096,6 +1135,10 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc, > > struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *from_mz, *to_mz; > > int nid, zid; > > int ret = -EBUSY; > > + struct page *page; > > + int cpu; > > + struct mem_cgroup_stat *stat; > > + struct mem_cgroup_stat_cpu *cpustat; > > > > VM_BUG_ON(from == to); > > VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(pc->page)); > > @@ -1116,6 +1159,23 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc, > > > > res_counter_uncharge(&from->res, PAGE_SIZE); > > mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(from, pc, false); > > + > > + page = pc->page; > > + if (page_is_file_cache(page) && page_mapped(page)) { > > + cpu = smp_processor_id(); > > + /* Update mapped_file data for mem_cgroup "from" */ > > + stat = &from->stat; > > + cpustat = &stat->cpustat[cpu]; > > + __mem_cgroup_stat_add_safe(cpustat, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_MAPPED_FILE, > > + -1); > > + > > + /* Update mapped_file data for mem_cgroup "to" */ > > + stat = &to->stat; > > + cpustat = &stat->cpustat[cpu]; > > + __mem_cgroup_stat_add_safe(cpustat, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_MAPPED_FILE, > > + 1); > > + } > > This function (mem_cgroup_move_account()) does a trylock_page_cgroup() > and if that fails it will bale out, and the newly-added code will not > be executed. yes. and returns -EBUSY. > > What are the implications of this? Does the missed accounting later get > performed somewhere, or does the error remain in place? > no error just -BUSY. the caller (now, only force_empty is the caller) will do retry. > That trylock_page_cgroup() really sucks - trylocks usually do. Could > someone please raise a patch which completely documents the reasons for > its presence, and for any other uncommented/unobvious trylocks? > > Where appropriate, the comment should explain why the trylock isn't > simply a bug - why it is safe and correct to omit the operations which > we wished to perform. > > Thanks. > Hmm...maybe we can replace trylock with lock, here. IIRC, this has been trylock because the old routine uses other locks (mem_cgroup' zone mz->lru_lock) before calling this. mz->lru_lock lock_page_cgroup() And there was other routine which calls lock_page_cgroup()->mz->lru_lock. lock_page_cgroup() -> mz->lru_lock. So, I used trylock here. But now, the lock(mz->lru_lock) is removed. I should check this. Thank you for pointing out. Regards, -Kame -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/