Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:19:11 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
       Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPU ring buffer
Message-ID: <20090422101911.GB1115@elte.hu>
References: <1240391484.6842.474.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com> <20090422092259.GC18226@elte.hu> <20090422101600.GL3226@erda.amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090422101600.GL3226@erda.amd.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 978
Lines: 27


* Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com> wrote:

> On 22.04.09 11:22:59, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPU ring buffer for better 
> > > scalability. Basic design is as follow:
> > 
> > Before changing anything substantial in the MCE code it would be 
> > necessary to clean up and then unify the 32-bit and 64-bit side 
> > of the MCE code first. (Which essentially means extending the 
> > 64-bit-only code to 32-bit)
> 
> You may also want to consider to use the in-kernel ring_buffer api 
> (include/linux/ring_buffer.h).

Yeah. I'd have suggested that once cleanups and unification is done 
(which is still a long way out :-).

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/