Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:49:20 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: James Kosin <jkosin@beta.intcomgrp.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD] voltage/current regulator consumer interface
Message-ID: <20090422154920.0dda2380@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <49EF2A3C.2050107@support.intcomgrp.com>
References: <ct38K-3Fq-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
	<ct38K-3Fq-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
	<ctmXD-1yA-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
	<ctnK4-2zP-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
	<ctoG9-458-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
	<ctoG9-458-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
	<ctoPK-4y5-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
	<ctoZv-4KN-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
	<ctFxn-5OC-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
	<ctG0r-6HL-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
	<49EF2A3C.2050107@support.intcomgrp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 789
Lines: 19

> > In power management line normally refers to the core, unregulated power
> > bus for the system and a line supply would normally be something like a
> > wall wart that supplies this directly when it's connected.
> 
> Can I suggest:
> "supply-switch" or "regulator-switch" may make more sense for the moment.

Can I suggest they don't. The naming should reflect the naming actually
used in the field by people working on the technology otherwise arbitary
renaming just creates confusion

The supply switch is the big switch on the back

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/