Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754975AbZDVSk0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:40:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752944AbZDVSkL (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:40:11 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:47373 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751576AbZDVSkJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:40:09 -0400 Message-ID: <49EF6457.90505@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:39:19 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andre Noll CC: Bill Davidsen , Matti Aarnio , Jesper Juhl , Prakash Punnoor , Michael Tokarev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, neilb@suse.de Subject: Re: Proposal: make RAID6 code optional References: <200904180946.27722.prakash@punnoor.de> <49E98AD2.8060601@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <200904181117.03418.prakash@punnoor.de> <20090418145850.GD28512@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <49EDD11E.2030309@tmr.com> <49EE00F9.6090000@zytor.com> <20090422180051.GD13280@skl-net.de> In-Reply-To: <20090422180051.GD13280@skl-net.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1068 Lines: 25 Andre Noll wrote: > On 10:23, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> We could use vmalloc() and generate the tables at initialization time. >> However, having a separate module which exports the raid6 declaration >> and uses the raid5 module as a subroutine library seems easier. > > Really? Easier than keeping only two 256-byte arrays for exp() and > log() and use these at runtime to populate the (dynamically allocated) > 64K GF multiplication table? That seems to be really simple and would > still shave off 64K of kernel memory for raid5-only users. > Yes, I believe it would be easier than having dynamically allocated arrays. Dynamically generated arrays using static memory allocations (bss) is one thing, but that would only reduce size of the module on disk, which I don't think anyone considers a problem. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/