Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 07:53:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 07:53:12 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:49682 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 07:52:55 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 09:51:54 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Mike Fedyk Cc: Bill Davidsen , Subject: Re: 2.4.19pre1aa1 In-Reply-To: <20020301034626.GG2711@matchmail.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Mike Fedyk wrote: > Look at it another way, by forcing Andrea to send it in as small > chunks with descriptions, we may finally get a documented -aa VM. ;) > So, lets watch and see that happen. That would be the preferred way. There must be some good stuff hidden in -aa, but it won't turn into maintainable code just by merging stuff into the kernel. It'll turn into maintainable code by having it merged in small, documented pieces. regards, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/