Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 11:24:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 11:24:46 -0500 Received: from e21.nc.us.ibm.com ([32.97.136.227]:15246 "EHLO e21.nc.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 11:24:32 -0500 Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 10:24:30 -0600 From: Dave McCracken To: Linus Torvalds , David Howells cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: thread groups bug? Message-ID: <36310000.1014999870@baldur> In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --On Thursday, February 28, 2002 16:20:21 -0800 Linus Torvalds wrote: > Maybe killing the other threads on execve _is_ the right thing after all, > if that also gives us POSIX behaviour. > > Who actually maintains the pthread library? I don't think they use > CLONE_THREAD at all yet, right? As far as I know, Linuxthreads is maintained by Ullrich Drepper, and it doesn't use CLONE_THREAD. IBM's NGPT pthread library does use CLONE_THREAD, and I'm the one who's handling kernel issues related to it. I could code up something that does a 'kill the thread group on execve' if you'd like me to. Dave McCracken ====================================================================== Dave McCracken IBM Linux Base Kernel Team 1-512-838-3059 dmccr@us.ibm.com T/L 678-3059 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/