From: anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Subject: Re: [rfc] built-in native compiler for Linux?
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-reply-to: <20090422085828.GA16917@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:22:24 GMT
Message-ID: <2009Apr23.222224@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1426
Lines: 30

Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes:
> Furthermore, a lot of optimizations in GCC are driven by 
>SPECint and SPECfp benchmarketing, with little practical relevance 
>to 99% of the apps, including the kernel.

Right, and it's not just the kernel that has to work around GCC
breakage, it's also many apps (possibly all of them except SPEC
benchmarks, and the few 100% C99-compliant programs (probably none
with more than than 500 lines of code)).

So I guess a decent alternative to GCC would attract not just the
kernel people, but also many (most?) applications people.  Then GCC
would no longer be misused for ordinary applications or kernels and it
could focus on its true destiny: compiling SPEC benchmarks.

Whether to build such a compiler mostly from scratch as you suggest or
as a fork of GCC is up to whoever does it.  The GCC fork variant has
the advantage of having a lot of targets available already, but the
disadvantage of a large and complex code base.

- anton
-- 
M. Anton Ertl                    Some things have to be seen to be believed
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at Most things have to be believed to be seen
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/