Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:11:41 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       stable@kernel.org, jejb@kernel.org,
       Justin Forbes <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>,
       Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
       "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
       Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Chuck Wolber <chuckw@quantumlinux.com>,
       Chris Wedgwood <reviews@ml.cw.f00f.org>,
       Michael Krufky <mkrufky@linuxtv.org>,
       Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@gmail.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
       Rodrigo Rubira Branco <rbranco@la.checkpoint.com>,
       Jake Edge <jake@lwn.net>, Eugene Teo <eteo@redhat.com>,
       torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
       alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
       Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Peter Lojkin <ia6432@inbox.ru>,
       Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch 057/100] posix-timers: fix RLIMIT_CPU && fork()
Message-ID: <20090423211141.GU3036@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
References: <20090423072020.428683652@sous-sol.org> <20090423072700.322939119@sous-sol.org> <20090423165940.622c8ad8@dhcp-100-2-144.bos.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090423165940.622c8ad8@dhcp-100-2-144.bos.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 976
Lines: 30

* Chuck Ebbert (cebbert@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:21:17 -0700
> Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org> wrote:
> 
> > -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> > ---------------------
> > 
> > From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> > 
> > upstream commit: 6279a751fe096a21dc7704e918d570d3ff06e769
> > 
> 
> The following commit was also submitted:
> 
>    37bebc70d7ad4144c571d74500db3bb26ec0c0eb
>    posix timers: fix RLIMIT_CPU && fork()
> 
> Did it get dropped because it has the exact same title?

No, Oleg said to ignore it in favor to the two that are in 2.6.29.2.
That first one was an attempt at a quick and dirty fix for 2.6.29,
but it missed 2.6.29 proper.

thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/