Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 13:37:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 13:37:03 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:49396 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 13:36:48 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 10:37:37 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Rik van Riel Cc: Bill Davidsen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.19pre1aa1 Message-ID: <20020301183737.GJ2711@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Rik van Riel , Bill Davidsen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020301034626.GG2711@matchmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 09:51:54AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > Look at it another way, by forcing Andrea to send it in as small > > chunks with descriptions, we may finally get a documented -aa VM. ;) > > So, lets watch and see that happen. > > That would be the preferred way. There must be some good stuff > hidden in -aa, but it won't turn into maintainable code just by > merging stuff into the kernel. > > It'll turn into maintainable code by having it merged in small, > documented pieces. > Let me see... "small chunks with descriptions". I think we're saying the same thing. What we need is to have those descriptions in the patches sent to Marcelo, that way the docs are in the code... Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/