Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:13:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:13:39 -0500 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:14099 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:13:28 -0500 Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 18:17:40 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Tom Rini Cc: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.2.18pre24 Message-ID: <20001130181740.A18566@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20001129150159.Y872@opus.bloom.county> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20001129150159.Y872@opus.bloom.county>; from trini@kernel.crashing.org on Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 03:01:59PM -0700 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 03:01:59PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > As Dave Miller pointed out, DEV_MAC_HID sysctl conflicts with the RAID patches That's right but OTOH I'd simply declare the sysctl-by-number interface dead for new introduced sysctl. We need to preserve backwards compatibility of course but that's not a problem. I'd preferred if we killed it completly (just providing backwards compatibility) during the 2.4.x cycle. Only reliable way to use new sysctl is sysctl-by-name IMHO. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/